Showing posts with label terrorism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label terrorism. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

11th Anniversary of 9-11 Attacks--Have we learned anything?



11 years ago today, thousands of Americans died.  What have we learned in the 11 years since the attack?

Not much apparently or at least the majority of Americans are still willfully ignorant about the truth of 9/11.

We were told:
Four planes were hijacked on that morning.  2 Planes were flown into the WTC towers with stunning precision. 1 plane was crashed into the side of the 5-story Pentagon building.  On the last plane, the passengers fought back and it crashed in a field in Somerset County Pennsylvania.  We were told that the hijackers were members of Al Qaeda and that the plot was masterminded by Osama Bin Laden. We were told that we were attacked because "they hate us and our freedoms and way of life."
As a result, we swiftly invaded Iraq; toppled their government; and killed anywhere from 110,000 to 1.03 million (including civilians and military personnel).  We also invaded Afghanistan because they were harboring these terrorists.  We toppled their government; killed 28,000+; and helped re-institute a government there.

The truth (or at least as I understand it from the evidence):
The truth, unfortunately, is much more nefarious.  The attacks on September 11th were orchestrated by the United States (or at the very least allowed to happen for political purposes). In fact, the US has planned to create false flags in the past and the US completed false flags in the past.  Some officials knew about the attacks (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) and yet no attempt was made to stop the attack.  Our country, in the past, had planned such false flags and even executed a few (such as the USS Liberty and USS Cole, see also Gulf of Tonkin incident).

Furthermore, we were told that Al Qaeda was responsible for the attacks.  Further evidence suggests that Al Qaeda doesn't even exist and it was created by the CIA as a scapegoat.

The US facilitated in attempted attacks for political purposes including helping the "underwear bomber" get on a plane (1).  This was "convenient", for lack of a better word, because the US needed the justification to roll out all of the body scanning devices it had purchased the year before.

As a result of the attacks on September 11th, our congress has passed dozens of bills, created federal agencies (the DHS & groin groping TSA were created post-9/11) and dozens of executive orders have been written increasing the power of the federal government and restricting the rights of citizens.


We are committed to a perpetual war on terror.  This war was the justification for the war on patriots

The DHS has put the "terrorists" on the back burner and waged war on patriots. They've been targeting libertarians, constitutionalists, evangelical Christians, gun owners, and veterans.

The TSA is planning on rolling out it's body scanners and psychological conditioning tactics (even admitting that they aren't making us safer) to train and bus stations. Pretty soon we won't be able to travel anywhere without having to show our papers to the American gestapo TSA.

And the government has waged war on our liberties via NDAA and the Patriot Act but even right to redress our grievances (our free speech).

We were told to support the patriot act because it makes us safer.

Are we any safer? We're 8 times more likely to die from a police officer than from a terrorist.

I could write so much more, but all I can say is believe half of what you see, none of what you hear and understand that democide results in more deaths than any war.

Lastly check out InfoWars' post on the 11th Anniversary of Sept. 11th.

Friday, July 20, 2012

Cinema Shooting, Theatre was "gun free zone"

I don't have time to write too much more, but apparently Cinemark (the parent company) has a no guns policy.

Cinemark has No Guns Policy

John Lott likewise has confirmed this.
Private business owners who invite the public onto their own premises can set their own policies: “Nothing in this part 2 [establishing the scope and limits of a Colorado concealed carry permit] shall be construed to limit, restrict, or prohibit in any manner the existing rights of a private property owner, private tenant, private employer, or private business entity.” Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 18-12-214(5). Source.

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Mumbia Terrorism: Another Blow to "Gun Control"

I found this article on Media with a Conscience.

Mumbai and the Horror of Gun Control

Contrary to what some advocates of 'gun control' tell you, removing a right to defend oneself never makes one safer as we've witnessed in the recent terrorist attacks in Mumbai.

In the wake of the terrorist attack in Mumbai, I can already hear the U.S. gun-control crowd calling for new gun-control measures here in the United States. There will be several big problems with their pleas.

One, as an article in the International Herald Tribune points out, India has strict gun-control laws. Those laws did not prevent the terrorist attack at the Oberoi and Taj Mahal Palace and Tower hotel. As libertarians have long been pointing out, terrorists and murderers have no reservations about disobeying gun-control laws. The long-held assumption among the gun-control crowd that murderers and terrorists will respect and obey gun-control laws, even while having no reservations about violating laws against murder and terrorism, is ridiculous, as the Mumbai killings once again demonstrate. READ MORE>>>

The International Herald Tribune (referenced above) points out this simple fact, "Obtaining a license for even a single [security] officer to carry a gun is extremely difficult in India, which has tight gun control laws."

The author also points to the words of a photographer, Sebastian D'Souza, who recounts his experience during the attack.

But what angered Mr D'Souza almost as much were the masses of armed police hiding in the area who simply refused to shoot back. "There were armed policemen hiding all around the station but none of them did anything," he said. "At one point, I ran up to them and told them to use their weapons. I said, 'Shoot them, they're sitting ducks!' but they just didn't shoot back."
...
The militants returned inside the station and headed towards a rear exit towards Chowpatty Beach. Mr D'Souza added: "I told some policemen the gunmen had moved towards the rear of the station but they refused to follow them. What is the point if having policemen with guns if they refuse to use them? I only wish I had a gun rather than a camera."
Frankly, I think D'Souza isn't alone in his frustration.

Freedom loving individuals throughout the globe share similar sentiments.

When the police can't protect me, why am I forbidden from having the means to protect myself?

ShareThis